Talk:Homestar's Resort

From Homestar Runner Fanstuff Wiki

Are you going to add more floors? I kind of want a higher room. Cyrus 15:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I could add a few more. How high? Zo977^Spring!

i can also have a higher room, if you don't mind. I got plenty of rooms to add.TVBAgain 17:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

How about I add three more floors. Zo977^Spring!

Sounds good to me.TVBAgain 17:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

---

BUBS: Where is the food court?

No really, where? SamuelGuy10 19:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

...Thanks! Zo977^Spring!

Here is a version of the old one, for reference. Raiku 21:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Is it possible if you can add a theme park?TVBAgain00:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Done = done. Zo977^Spring!

---

I'm back, do I win anything?-- Kirbychu HR'D 14:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You win the resort! Zo977^Spring!

...Yay?-- Kirbychu HR'D 23:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

R-r-r-rule breaker!

Look under interactives. As far as I know, this is NOT all on one page. These are multiple pages that create RC spam. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 02:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

...Crap. Well, I have no idea how to strike a counterargument. But lets at least wait until Zoo/Kirbychu comes on. Either that or wait for a mod/sysop. -- Badstar

Okay, nevermind. Loophole found. If that rule is true, then that means every interactive should be deleted. Even mine! -- Badstar

Not all of them. Ones with everything on one page, and interactives created before the purge. Also, games like Astromund's Quest AREN'T actual interactives, more like a text adventure. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 03:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, but one more loophole. Technically, this was made before the purge. It was just brought back in exact condition. -- Badstar

This wasn't made before the purge. It was Kirbychu's Resort and it was deleted for breaking rules. This is a remake, and plus, it's not on the Gravy Boat, so it's not made before the purge. LOOPHOLE FAIL LeCowPaunch (Talk)

LOOPHOLE WIN. It was eventually changed into Homestar's Resort, remember? -- Badstar

COUNTER ATTACK LOOPHOLE FAIL. I still don't see it on the Gravy Boat. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 03:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, BUT! It was technically made before the purge, but this is just an exact copy of the original! This technically means it was created before the purge. Its not a remake, as no changes were made. -- Badstar

....That actually helps Cow's argument. It was specifically stated that you can't just repost old fanstuff from before the purge on here. Bellstrom 03:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

...CRAP! ...Well, I give up. -- Badstar

Yep. I knew you would run out of loopholes sooner or later :D LeCowPaunch (Talk) 03:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

{kills colons} I dunno if this helps, but here's my probably fail counter-argument. This fanstuff had existed before the purge, but the version up now has stricter rules, different places, and was created by a different user, making it partly a past game, but also partly a new game. If this holds true, then it would seem that it can't be deleted because it returned from the purge, as it has new elements, but can't be deleted because of it's setup because a different version had existed previously on the pre-purge wiki. I dunno, I'm really tired and will probably think this defence statement sounds like garbage when I read it again tomorrow, but it works for now...-- Kirbychu HR'D 06:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Its Dot Com himself said not to recreate stuff that wasn't on the Gravy Boat. It breaks rules, and you can't deny it. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 06:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

He's not recreating it, it's basically a new game. Raiku 06:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Raiku, it still breaks rules. Interactives are now limited to have only very few pages. This has a ton of pages and creates RC spam that nobody likes. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 06:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but it is one of the few fun things here. Raiku 06:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Fun doesn't really matter. It breaks rules, and it needs to be deleted. Don't bother me, I'm going to watch SNL. LeCowPaunch (Talk) 06:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

There's not a whole lot on each subpage, couldn't you just move everything onto a single page and no one would care about it anymore? - Joshua 11:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Second'd! LeCowPaunch (Talk) 00:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I think I has the solution

A few users who are 'contributing' to this are pretty much trolls. What if (if this is deleted) there was a fanstuff called homestars resort, but only a few users would be allowed to edit it? Zo977^Spring!

I could in all honesty care less if this gets deleted, really. This game is WAY past it's prime. The original run was good, but there's no way this will ever go as well as the original had, and even if we were to win this argument the game will probably be ignored and almost forgotten in under 2 months. This game was good when it started, but the idea's gotten old and trying to remake it will probably do more harm then good. Sometimes it's just best to let go. Even though I would love to see something I designed stay popular, some things just aren't worth trying to save to support those false-hopes.-- Kirbychu HR'D 12:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

...oh, and I kinda like the idea of "mini, limited membership" H*R's Resort. We'd really need to work out a good system for it, though.-- Kirbychu HR'D 12:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we could do something like making Homestar's Resort a sweepstakes. You could send a "video" on how you deserve a vacation at that resort, and then K-Chu picks out a lucky 10 or something. Cyrus 10:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Or we could just play with the people we already got and lock off newcomers. Raiku 21:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The only way you can not get this deleted is if you merge everything onto one page. I mean, there's little to no content on each page, so why dont you just do that? LeCowPaunch (Talk) 23:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

That'd be... ridiculously long. -- Badstar